One of the current systems that I use for MLB wagering involves
assigning probabilities of hitting a parlay and computes the expected return
per dollar wagered. I place wagers on any parlay with expected return greater
than $1.00. Most of these parlays involve wagers on a home team and under, or a
visitor and over. On occasion, like today, there will be positive returns on
two contradictory parlays on a single game. For instance, the expected return
on the White Sox and under today is $1.146, while the Indians and over is
$1.057. So, what to do?
I posed this question in the “Handicapper Think Tank” forum
on sportsbookreview.com a while back. The topic was “A different type of
hedging dilemma”. The responses were mixed. Hence the dilemma. I used my last 8
years of data to look for similar situations. I found 149 situations where both
parlays had positive and different expected returns (there were 3 games with
identical expected returns). I looked at different wagering scenarios. The
results follow.
Bet on highest return
|
Bet on lowest
|
||||||
Year
|
Bets
|
Net
|
Ret/$
|
Bets
|
Net
|
Ret/$
|
|
2010
|
24
|
$376
|
$1.16
|
24
|
-$144
|
$0.94
|
|
2011
|
19
|
-$359
|
$0.81
|
19
|
$845
|
$1.44
|
|
2012
|
14
|
-$587
|
$0.58
|
14
|
$384
|
$1.27
|
|
2013
|
28
|
$893
|
$1.32
|
28
|
-$987
|
$0.65
|
|
2014
|
17
|
-$628
|
$0.63
|
17
|
$407
|
$1.24
|
|
2015
|
16
|
$222
|
$1.14
|
16
|
-$613
|
$0.62
|
|
2016
|
16
|
$490
|
$1.31
|
16
|
-$590
|
$0.63
|
|
2017
|
15
|
$1,753
|
$2.17
|
15
|
-$492
|
$0.67
|
|
Total
|
149
|
$2,160
|
$1.14
|
149
|
-$1,190
|
$0.92
|
Clearly betting on the parlay with the highest expected
return had the best results, returning $1.14 per dollar wagered. Betting on the
worst of the two was a money loser, returning only $0.92 per dollar. I did look
at betting equally on both and a half unit on the worst of the two. These had
positive returns, but lower than just betting on the better of the two. Clearly
the poorer performer was dragging down the better.
Roughly two-thirds of the better performer was on the home
and under while the other third was the visitor and over. This is consistent
with the parlay biases published in previous posts. If you have any questions
or comments on this issue, feel free to post them on the topic at “Handicapper
Think Tank”. You can also Email me at ole44bill@gmail.com.
I have another MLB study that I’m working on and will publish soon. Follow me @ole44bill
on Twitter to know when it is done.
No comments:
Post a Comment